The site of The INSEE has been hacked on Thursday morning by employees of the same structure. I use the term hacker because it is still unacceptable to hijack 50 000 Internet users because people do not want to move their buttocks on the beautiful city of Metz (500) and 250 jobs created at come.
It is hoped that the closure of the site is final and that different employees in charge of the site is transferred. As stated so well a majority of Internet users, INSEE is a tool in the balance of power that has no independence so far without it ca reduce the expenses of the state!
The phrase that symbolizes this action is: "What if tomorrow this production was more accessible to all, but reserved the only information of political power? What would the quality of democratic debate? "
Well who cares royally, what it means less waste! and democratic debate was long ago when we saw the quality level of all candidates. And democracy starts already with respect for others and not by hostage taking two balls, then you webmaster of INSEE, then the reactive site if you have a hint of reflection!
What is more fun is the link that refers to the site to the petition for which it is entitled to a nice error message: "Database Error: Unable to connect to the database: Could not connect to MySQL" ( shame!), if the quality of INSEE staff is at the management site for the petition, it is clear that the statistical figures are more approximate!
This is a serious threat to us all to keep all those staff who, once he has every opportunity to fuck on strike still come to shit his world by cutting a functional website. It is an obvious act of sabotage that has no place in public service. It is as if agents of the SNCF (also love the strike) was to sabotage the TGV.
So, is what this institute is controlled by a gang of terrorists?
Most animals in this case are ultimately not the main interrested (well if still not bad) is good but not their fault, they did not do it on purpose but those who manage them and thus always same: the political power!
The site of INSEE (if it works): http://www.insee.fr/
While the computer is excited! Do you know at least the ins and outs of this business?? I think not ... so as said Coluche, when we have nothing to say it closes its mouth.
Thank you for this kind support a possible future libel suit ... ... ...
no I know not but I'm open to debate and what kind of response does not raise the level of discussion. At the same time if you bump with them, I understand better.
I do not think it starts a debate by insulting people ... ... ... ... ... especially when you know nothing about ... ... ... ... ...
this is a criticism towards the method used is similar to that of voluntary sabotage. It can strike without blocking a website I think.
Precisely, the INSEE officials are not the terrorists that you so ardently wish to see fired. They continue their work anyway and do not want to stop them ... ... .. when their lack of independence, it is the contrary they pay today.
Vive modernity and e-strike
))
And of course I recognize that you're not terrorists, but the method is very disappointing for me.
I am willing to an e-strike but a single banner to the top might be enough to raise awareness to 50 000 daily users of the danger that lurks and do much more around the web without putting back some of the public.
When independence is clear they pay now but I still think that the figures are not always those who should know. But now, the policy attempts to regain control over a majority of media (TV France, INSEE apparently ...). The freedoms are reduced for all!
For the band, I hope this will be discussed but it is still necessary that management agrees, because it is she who is "owner" of pages. so a redirection should be easier to do ... ... .. well, the pages belonging to the INSEE are not affected!
As regards numbers, but there are plenty ... .. but it is probably possible to improve the system, what agents are INSEE whenever they can.
For Metz, well just imagine the life of the agent who is said overnight without study or consultation: "you break in Metz and your wife / your husband, your children, your home, it s 'knock in "... ... .... when that same agent has all the means of economic analysis at its disposal to know more than this provision would not help in the Moselle and is a form of coercion!!
INSEE, with all its faults and also his great qualities (yes, really) has always been proud of his independence, his scientific approach, and its quest for quality in statistical production ... ... confidentiality, scientific rigor and independence are our only guarantee ... ..
I understand perfectly entitled to strike an officer with respect to relocation. The same goes for private companies who would send their factories overseas and try to place employees on the few sites that remain in France.
Except for me, a private company will manage to earn more money by relocating while to move staff to the INSEE Metz is in my opinion a real money pit. It is always the case for projects of state or local authority. It does not matter because you can not run then it is fun or we are pleased to friends
.
For the redirection actually, but the field is still at INSEE not?
It is true that the area belongs to the INSEE, but it's less annoying than affect the content I found. But I still think that this idea would be positive band and the direction of INSEE should accept it as a lesser evil!
However, when you say that this relocation would be a money pit, you can not just fall over
... ... ... And is compounded by the fact that it would bring little or nothing to the Mosel!
Thank you for these changes
... ... .. And I hope that this debate will end quickly and 
And if I told you that this site (yes, yes, the very one where I'm posting it) serves as the gateway (1) for attempted hacking sites motosisés the CMS Joomla!
(1) IP addresses and evidence being consolidated ...
Having already been several attempts to hack, especially from Romania who has installed several IRC servers.
So I will try to verify if it has not yet been there. A wordpress plugin with flaws.
Could you give me more details. Thank you
"I will try to check ..."
Me, I like that phrase!
"Check" is one thing ... but "try to check", what does that mean? eh? especially for a Webmaster (well, it's not safe!)
And then when we see the course (CV) of the person ...
we ask questions ...
Would it make no Foutage of mouth in the air?
Come on, continuing your little hacking attempts if it amuses you ... and especially do not be surprised!
I like your answers too. And indeed, I am not a webmaster, just look at the header at the top to see my PHP code!
My specialty is coconut Wordpress. I just know the name of Joomla CMS I have never installed and still less tempted hacked site. I'm quite a target.
But apparently if you suffer hacking attempts, it may be true that it is a sieve? I suggest you then move on Wordpress which base is quite effective. Plugins can, however, have flaws.
So once more, and more seriously, amicably and without Foutage mouth of what is the problem? What you see as hacking attempt?